/var/www/htdocs/pustaka-digital/lib/SearchEngine/SearchBiblioEngine.php:688 "Search Engine Debug 🔎 🪲"
Engine Type ⚙️: "SLiMS\SearchEngine\SearchBiblioEngine"
SQL ⚙️: array:2 [ "count" => "select count(sb.biblio_id) from search_biblio as sb where sb.opac_hide=0 and ((match (sb.author) against (:author in boolean mode)))" "query" => "select sb.biblio_id, sb.title, sb.author, sb.topic, sb.image, sb.isbn_issn, sb.publisher, sb.publish_place, sb.publish_year, sb.labels, sb.input_date, sb.edition, sb.collation, sb.series_title, sb.call_number from search_biblio as sb where sb.opac_hide=0 and ((match (sb.author) against (:author in boolean mode))) order by sb.last_update desc limit 10 offset 0" ]
Bind Value ⚒️: array:1 [ ":author" => "'+Hegarty, Seamus'" ]
University rankings are ‘hot’. Some universities, policy makers and journalists seem to take them quite seriously. At the same time, however, they are also fiercely criticized. The best known worldwide rankings tend, for instance, to have a strong anglo-saxon bias and tend to give insufficient valorisation to human sciences.